<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;ll help you, but first hear me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://routecafe.com/posts/ill-help-you-but-first-hear-me.moccha/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://routecafe.com/posts/ill-help-you-but-first-hear-me.moccha</link>
	<description>It's all about David's Blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 03:27:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Johnson</title>
		<link>http://routecafe.com/posts/ill-help-you-but-first-hear-me.moccha/comment-page-1#comment-2375</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://routecafe.com/?p=194#comment-2375</guid>
		<description>I hear you on this one.  Having been around many programmers and being one myself, it&#039;s often just one giant pissing match about who&#039;s method is the best.  The sad thing is that it&#039;s often hard to remember why certain methods are the best, or even what the metrics for &quot;best&quot; are in a particular case (because as we all know they&#039;re never the same...).  Standards are important and all, but you&#039;re unlikely to get a raise for *wasting time* following every little validation point, they don&#039;t make your application do back flips and make pancakes at the same time, and they&#039;ll never get you laid.

In all seriousness though, the best advice that I&#039;ve given other programmers, fledgling and seasoned, is to, &quot;be zealous about nothing except about not being zealous.&quot;  Or, in other words, &quot;get a grip and get some perspective.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you on this one.  Having been around many programmers and being one myself, it&#8217;s often just one giant pissing match about who&#8217;s method is the best.  The sad thing is that it&#8217;s often hard to remember why certain methods are the best, or even what the metrics for &#8220;best&#8221; are in a particular case (because as we all know they&#8217;re never the same&#8230;).  Standards are important and all, but you&#8217;re unlikely to get a raise for *wasting time* following every little validation point, they don&#8217;t make your application do back flips and make pancakes at the same time, and they&#8217;ll never get you laid.</p>
<p>In all seriousness though, the best advice that I&#8217;ve given other programmers, fledgling and seasoned, is to, &#8220;be zealous about nothing except about not being zealous.&#8221;  Or, in other words, &#8220;get a grip and get some perspective.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
